CoinForBarter PHP SDK
Laravel · merchant integration · webhooks
PHP · Laravel · HTTP client · TestingProblem
CoinForBarter merchants integrating directly against the REST API repeatedly hit the same problems: signing requests, retry logic on flaky networks, parsing webhook signatures, and writing boilerplate around charge / verify / refund flows. Each merchant was solving it on their own — slowly, inconsistently, and often incorrectly.
Approach
- 01
Designed a small typed client surface around four verbs that mapped to merchant intent: charge, verify, refund, webhooks.
- 02
Hid HTTP, signing, idempotency keys, and retry policy inside the SDK so merchants only think in domain terms.
- 03
Wrote a Laravel-style facade so it slotted into existing PHP apps with one line of config.
- 04
Shipped runnable examples for the three most common scenarios — POS, e-commerce checkout, and webhook receiver.
Outcome
- 01
New merchant integrations went from days to hours; the SDK README is the integration guide.
- 02
Webhook signature handling was centralised — eliminated a class of replay-attack mistakes that early integrators made.
- 03
Bug reports dropped to almost zero because the surface area got smaller and was tested.
- 04
Merchants who upgraded got new endpoints automatically — no support ticket queue.
Lessons
- 01
A good SDK is a contract, not a wrapper. Design the verbs from the merchant's problem, not the API's shape.
- 02
Idempotency, retries, and signature verification belong in the SDK, not in every merchant's integration code.
- 03
The fastest documentation is a working example. Ship those before the prose.